28 July 2014 – Brooklyn Cyclones at Lowell Spinners

We have all lost the will to win

Last year, the second Cyclones night game in Lowell was rained out.  This year looked like it could be a repeat with the tarp on the field and thunderstorms rolling through at the scheduled game time of 7:05pm.  First pitch was delayed by more than an hour, but this game would take place.  This sloppy mess of a game that went on for more than three hours with six errors and countless more misplays that might as well have been called errors.  Nobody particularly dominated but the Spinners lost control in the 6th to hand the Cyclones an 8-5 victory in front of a crowd of dozens.

Box Score

Alberto Baldonado

Alberto Baldonado took the mound on Monday, sandwiched in the rotation between Marcos Molina and Casey Meisner.  While he’s not as big a name as the other two, Baldonado did an admirable job under the circumstances and held the Spinners to two runs over five innings.  While the box score only shows one error by the Cyclones over that span, the defense was much worse than that.  Amed Rosario missed on throws to first twice in the 5th inning alone, continuing his defensive woes in Lowell.

Danny Mars slides in safely for the first of three stolen bases on the night

The Spinners took control of the basepaths early with leadoff batter Danny Mars stealing second and third after walking in the 1st.  Mars would go on to score in that inning, but he pushed his luck a base too far his next time up, opting to test right fielder Michael Bernal’s arm on a base hit and getting tagged out at second.  Mars would steal again in the 8th, but he would finish the game as the only Spinner with multiple steals; Mauricio Dubon tried to steal second and third in the 6th but was called out at third to end the inning.

Michael Bernal

Michael Bernal had already rubbed the Spinners the wrong way before throwing out Mars in the 3rd.  He entered the game after going 4-for-4 with 4 RBI in the series opener and made those all into 5s on the series in the 2nd with a solo home run to tie the game.  In the process, he did something to draw the ire of Spinners catcher David Sopilka, who he exchanged words with as he crossed home plate.  The umpires issued warnings after the incident and Bernal seemed to lengthen his backswing on subsequent at-bats, going hitless with two strikeouts his next four times up.

I don’t know what happened either

Little else of note happened until the 6th inning, now three hours past the original start time.  Amed Rosario set the tone for the inning with a ground ball under the first baseman’s glove for a leadoff double.  One out later, Michael Conforto failed to extend his hitting streak by walking.  A wild pitch and a Bernal strikeout brought up Will Fulmer, who drove in a run when the Cyclones were trailing on Sunday.  He did one better on Monday with a pop up to shallow center field that somehow made it past three Spinners fielders to drop in for a 2-RBI double that gave the Cyclones a 3-2 lead.  Tomas Nido sent one to the same spot to drive in Fulmer, then Tucker Tharp and Anthony Chavez followed with hits on their own.  Chavez would advance to third on an error, setting up the most bizarre play of the inning.  Adrian Abreu popped up to just in front of the pitcher’s mound and, with four Spinners players in close proximity, the ball fell to the ground unimpeded.  Chavez, expecting to jog into the dugout after the third out, was unprepared and scrambled home, not that anyone was there to field a throw.  The Cyclones had scored six runs on a comedy of errors.

Joe Tuschak

Joe Tuschak: Designated Hittee

After the Cyclones got out of a jam in the bottom half on a questionable out call at third base, it was back to business as usual in the top of the 7th.  With one out, Michael Conforto extended his hitting streak to 10 games, Michael Bernal reached and advanced to second on an error, and Will Fulmer walked to load the bases.  That brought up Joe Tuschak, pinch hitting for the designated hitter (how does that phrase make any sort of logical sense?).  Tuschak, whether designated or pinch, did not do any hitting.  Instead, he was hit by a pitch, driving in Conforto from third.

Shane Bay

The Spinners would answer back with three runs off Josh Prevost to cut the Cyclones’ lead to three runs going into the bottom of the 9th.  Shane Bay came in for the save and, after giving up two hits, finished things off with a double play and a fly ball to center.  With the stadium so empty that player chatter could be heard clearly from the stands and with game 3 due to start in less than 12 hours, this game was finally over.

Final Score: Brooklyn 8, Lowell 5

27 July 2014 – Brooklyn Cyclones at Lowell Spinners

Bark in the Park is bad news for Katz

The Cyclones made their annual trip to Lowell on Sunday and three of MLB.com’s newly-announced midseason top 20 Mets prospects were in play for the opener.  Michael Conforto (#4) would drive in Amed Rosario (#7) for the game’s first run, but Marcos Molina (#16) didn’t have his best stuff on the mound and didn’t get any favors from the Brooklyn defense (including his own).  Down 3-1 after three innings, Molina settled in and the Brooklyn offense stepped up to take game 1 9-3.  The comeback was sparked by Michael Bernal, who entered the game in the bottom of the third when Michael Katz had to be driven off the field after an injury.

Box Score

Michael Conforto entered the game with an 8-game hitting streak, which dates back to his professional debut just over a week ago.  More than a month after the Mets drafted him 10th overall, fans were eager to see what he could do.  They didn’t have to wait very long on Sunday as he extended his hitting streak in the top of the 1st with a double off the left field wall that drove in Amed Rosario.  The offense went silent the next time through the order, with the only baserunner erased on a double play.  After Conforto grounded out for the second out in the 4th, it would be up to a different Michael to get the Cyclones going again.

Marcos Molina came out of nowhere to start landing on top prospect lists last year.  Well, only if you consider rookie ball to be “nowhere.”  Still, he started in Brooklyn this year with a lot of buzz and has generally impressed.  After a quick 1-2-3 first inning where he looked like he was throwing batting practice and still getting outs, Molina’s luck ran out in the second.  With his fastball only hitting the high 80s and his pitches not hitting the strike zone when they needed to, the Spinners took advantage and did some hitting of their own with three singles and a walk scoring two runs.  The final hit of the inning was a bunt single that Molina fielded poorly and then tried to make a throw to first from a seated position.  Molina’s throwing error allowed the go-ahead run to score, making this the second time I’ve seen a throwing error by a highly-touted Cyclones pitcher lead to a run.

Marcos Molina gets out of a 2nd inning jam

The Cyclones added injury to insult in the bottom of the third when a ground ball to second went horribly wrong.  Michael Katz, the lone player to not have a dog photo used on the scoreboard (for obvious reasons), stretched too far attempting to catch the throw, missed, and fell to the ground clutching his knee.

Katz was down for a full two minutes before he was able to stand on his own, after which he was whisked away on the back of a Gator (and not one of the three gator mascots at the park).  With Katz out of the game, Will Fullmer shifted to first base and Michael Bernal entered the game in right field.  A passed ball and a single put Lowell up 3-1 with nobody out, but that would be the extent of their offense for the night.  The Cyclones however were just getting started.

And that brings us to the top of the 4th with Michael Bernal at the plate for the first time with two outs.  The inning looked to be over when Bernal popped one up just foul in shallow right, but the Spinners couldn’t make the play.  That proved to be the turning point of the game; Bernal would later send the ball and half of his bat into left field and then, after a walk to Tyler Moore, would score on a Will Fulmer single to pull the Cyclones to within one run.  They would strand the bases loaded, but their bats were now wide awake.

How the Spinners’ baserunning ended

And that’s really where the game ended and the beating began.  Molina allowed two baserunners in the bottom half on a fielding error by Amed Rosario and a HBP, but the Cyclones would face the minimum from there.  Molina sat down on another bunt in the 6th, but the runner would be caught stealing after being sent back to first on his first attempt due to hitter’s interference.  Brad Wieck, wearing Corey Oswalt’s jersey, pitched two perfect innings and Paul Paez finished the game with a perfect 9th.

As for the Cyclones’ offense, well, they were just getting started.  After scoring in the 4th, Bernal went on to get three more hits, finishing the night 4-for-4 with 4 RBI.  The rest of the lineup pitched in as well, with all nine spots in the lineup recording hits and six with at least one RBI.

Final score: Brooklyn 9, Lowell 3

Comprehensive Baseball Ink Test: Overview

Now we’re getting serious

Like anyone with a big stack of autographed baseballs, the last thing I want to see happen to them is for the autograph to fade away to nothing over time.  Unfortunately, there isn’t much literature out there on this problem, just collections of anecdotes.  Over the past year, I’ve conducted a couple of tests to help make sense of the mechanisms involved and give me an idea of where to go next.  With the preliminary research out of the way, it’s time to go full-scale and test the key variables to finally answer the question of what a baseball should be signed with.  To get up to speed, start with these posts:

Faded Memories in Ink on Leather

Synthetic Leather Baseball Ink Test Phase 2

Baseball Ink Test Preliminary Results

Disclaimers

But first, let’s go over what I’m not accounting for.  One concern that this test will not resolve is about the effect of different pen pressures and stroke styles on the longevity of a signature.  Theoretically, an autopen setup could be used to carefully control these aspects of the test, but I don’t have one.  Also, these factors are out of the control of the receivers of an autograph, so I’m not sure what could be gained.  This is an area where this test will fall short of full technical rigor and I would be negligent if I failed to point that out.

Also beyond the scope of this experiment is the effect on temperature and humidity on the different aspects of this process.  These factors could significantly affect the flow of ink from the pen, the application of the ink to the ball, and the durability of the ink over time.  Environmental conditions will be the same for the initial application of all ink and will be the same within each test location, though these locations will not be maintained to guarantee identical conditions between locations.  Some variation is accepted as a limitation of this test.

Test Configuration

With that, we have enough of an understanding of the problem to put together a final comprehensive test to identify the best pens to use on either synthetic or natural leather baseballs.

Test Surface

The surfaces used in this testing will be Rawlings CROLB (natural leather, $3.09/1) lot #ERBA2 and OLB3 (synthetic leather, $12.99/6) lot #EOBA5 baseballs.  Results from this testing should be applicable to any other Rawlings baseball using one of these two surfaces, including official MLB baseballs (same surface material as the CROLB), though this has not been confirmed and may not hold true (spoiler: it doesn’t).  Rawlings also makes baseballs with a composite leather cover but those will not be used in this test.  All baseballs used were purchased at retail (Target) in March of 2014.

Test Environment

All baseballs exposed to light will be enclosed in an Ultra PRO UV Protected Ball Holder.  All ball holders used were purchased at retail in March of 2014 ($3 each at local hobby store).  Each ball in a holder will also have a corresponding control ball with identical markings kept in darkness directly beneath the exposed ball.  Control balls will be enclosed inside the box from from the ball holder to provide an equivalent environment with light as the only variable; a napkin will be placed over the ball to prevent direct contact between the ink and any hard surface and to block any stray light that might get in around the box lid.

Test Site 1: Direct Sunlight (feat. Sunny)

Three different lighting conditions will be used: full direct sunlight (southern facing windowsill), partial direct sunlight (eastern facing windowsill), and indirect sunlight (on the top of my stack of autographed baseballs).  To prevent indoor lighting from contaminating either of the windowsill locations, enclosures will be placed around the test area (this will also prevent accidental disturbance of the test areas).  The third test location is in a room with incandescent lights but fluorescent light is present elsewhere in the house.  This will be considered a representative display location and no effort will be taken to block artificial light.  All balls in holders will be tilted to the same angle to ensure that all inks are exposed to similar lighting (angles of incidence will unavoidably vary but should not be a factor with the extreme level of sunlight exposure involved).

Test Site 2: Direct/Indirect Sunlight

Inks Tested

Inks to be tested will fall into two categories: ballpoint and porous point.  All ballpoints will be blue medium point from different manufacturers covering a range of price points from cheap bulk pens to high-end refills.  Porous point pens will include both black and blue versions of each brand tested, when possible.  All ballpoints and the Staedtler, Bic, and Pentel porous point pens were purchased at retail in March of 2014.  The Sharpie porous point pens were purchased in 2013 and the Pilot and PaperMate porous point pens are at least a decade old (these are only being used because it was not feasible to obtain new samples at retail).  Details of the pens used are as follows.

Bulk Ballpoints

Bic Round Stic    $1.69/12
Purchased from Amazon.com in March of 2014.

PaperMate Write Bros.    $1.99/12
Purchased from Amazon.com in March of 2014

Retractable Ballpoints

Pentel RSVP    $4.00/5 (sale)
Purchased at Staples in March of 2014.

Pilot EasyTouch    $1.99/2
Purchased at Stop and Shop in March of 2014.

Refill Ballpoints

Zebra F301 Refill    $1.99/2
Purchased from Amazon.com in March of 2014

Cross Refill    $5.79/2
Purchased from Amazon.com in March of 2014

Parker QuinkFlow Refill    $6.29/1
Purchased at Staples in March of 2014.

Leeds 9092-12RF Refill    $0.76/1
Purchased from leedsworldrefill.com in March of 2014

Porous Point Pens

Sharpie Pen (blue and black)    $5.09/3 (assorted colors)
Purchased at Target in 2013.

Bic Intensity .5mm (blue and black)    $5.99/5 (assorted colors)
Purchased at Staples in March of 2014.

Staedtler Fineliner .3mm (blue and black) $11.49/10 (assorted colors)
Purchased at Staples in March of 2014.

Pentel Finito (blue and black)    $6.49/6 (assorted colors)
Purchased at Staples in March of 2014.

Pilot Razor Point (blue and black)
Unknown purchase date/location.

PaperMate (black)
Unknown purchase date/location.

PaperMate Liquid Expresso (blue)
Unknown purchase date/location.

Decision Analysis Process

Before we get to the test itself, we need to understand what we’re looking for and how to evaluate it.  We’ll start with what is expected of the ink and then define some metrics to evaluate the performance of each pen against our requirements.  The final result will be a set of scores to measure relative performance of each pen and identify strengths and weaknesses.

Requirements

The goal of this experiment is to find the ideal pen to use when getting signatures on baseballs.  This pen will need to be able to put a quality signature down on the surface of the ball, maintain the integrity of that signature until it can be put on display, and retain a quality signature while on display indefinitely.

Signature Application

When it comes to the original signature, the pen needs to lay down an even layer of ink through every stroke.  This means no gaps or light spots and no pooling or dripping.  Pressure could be a factor here but is not something that we will be able to test this time around.  Our first performance metric will therefore be Ink Coverage.

Ink Stability

The next challenge after getting the signature onto the surface of the ball is keeping it intact until it can get to a storage or display location.  Some amount of handling, including direct contact with the signature, must be assumed.  In order for the signature to remain undamaged, the ink must dry sufficiently in a short period of time, probably less than a minute, under the full range of normal environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, etc.).  Again, these factors provide a range of possibilities that exceed this particular test configuration.  Relative resistance to smudging under the same conditions will be as much as this test can evaluate with the performance metric of Smudge Resistance.

Display Performance

Once the signed ball has reached its permanent location, it needs to be possible to put it on display in a typical display environment without suffering damage that renders the signature unreadable.  The use of a plastic ball cube is assumed to be a component of the typical display environment.  The primary mechanism of degradation in this environment is fading due to light exposure.  The performance metric of Fade Resistance will take into consideration the effects of direct and indirect sunlight exposure and the effects of a mixed natural/artificial light environment.  No specific evaluations of different types of artificial lighting will be performed at this time.

Storage Performance

Another possible destination for an autographed baseball is storage in a dark location.  Previous testing has indicated that the primary mechanism of degradation in this environment is bleeding, giving us the final performance metric of Bleed Resistance.

Evaluation Method

Each of the four performance metrics will be assessed separately on a High/Medium/Low scale for each ink/surface combination.  A High rating will be worth 20 points, a Medium rating will be worth 10 points, and a Low rating will be worth 0 points, for a maximum possible score of 80.  The option(s) with the highest total score will be the preferred options, with advantages and disadvantages explained to allow for evaluation of suitability for specific uses.  In the event of a tie, preference will be given to the option with the highest minimum rating (10/20/10/20 will outperform 20/20/20/0).

Next Up: Initial Photos and Ink Coverage

2014 Mets Draft Class Autographs

Six out of eleven ain’t bad

Full list of 2014 Mets draft picks

After drafting just five players with any baseball cards in 2013, the Mets came up big in 2014 with 11 of 39 picks having certified autograph cards.  Most of these were from 2013 Leaf Perfect Game, which has asserted itself as the premier pre-pro product and should merit a look when it returns later this year.  While the Mets did sign all of their picks in the first 20 rounds, most late-round high school picks declined to sign, taking away five players with 2013 Leaf Perfect Game autographs: Luke Bonfield, Tommy Pincin, Keaton McKinney, Jordan Hand, and Jonathan Teaney.  McKinney and Hand also have various memorabilia cards, leaving top pick Michael Conforto as the only signed Mets pick from 2014 with memorabilia.  The loss of nearly half of the potential autographs in this draft class is unfortunate, but the remainder still rates as the best-ever draft day autograph crop.

1 Michael Conforto 3 Milton Ramos 4 Eudor Garcia-Pacheco 5 Josh Prevost
6 Tyler Moore 7 Brad Wieck 8 Dash Winningham 9 Michael Katz
10 Kelly Secrest 13 Erik Manoah 18 Raphael Ramirez 40 Dale Burdick

Previous Editions:

2013 Mets Draft Class Autographs
2012 Mets Draft Class Autographs
2011 Mets Draft Class Autographs

2013 Futures Game Material Overview

Stars of tomorrow, jerseys from last year

On Sunday, Noah Syndergaard made his second futures game appearance, closing out the USA team’s 3-2 victory after starting off last year’s Futures Game at Citi Field.  It will be a few months before his jersey from this year’s Futures Game makes its way into cards, but last year’s edition is now widely available thanks to last month’s 2014 Bowman Inception.  In fact, Inception seems to have been the destination for much of the material from the 2013 Futures Game, leaving very little to fill the time before this year’s material appears (likely in 2014 Bowman Draft in November, possibly sooner).  While every year is different, here’s a look back at where the jerseys from the Mets prospects in last year’s Futures Game ended up.

For a guide to the various material types discussed here, see this breakdown of the 2013 NL All-Star jersey.

See all Futures Game material in the archives: USA Team | World Team

2013 Bowman Draft Picks & Prospects

Players: Rafael Montero, Brandon Nimmo
Material: Primary

Bowman Draft Picks & Prospects is a typical landing spot for Futures Game material, so it wasn’t surprising to see the first 2013 Futures Game swatches show up here.  Of the three Mets though, only Rafael Montero and Brandon Nimmo were featured here and only with pieces of the primary fabric panels.  Noah Syndergaard would not have any material released in 2013.  Dilson Herrera, received in the August trade of Marlon Byrd and John Buck to the Pirates, does have jersey cards here but not as a Met, making them ineligible.  These cards have several serial numbered parallel tiers, but none of them contain any different material.

2014 Bowman

Players: Rafael Montero, Brandon Nimmo, Noah Syndergaard
Material: Primary, Secondary, Side Panel

As usual, the first Bowman product of the year included a few pieces of last year’s Futures Game jerseys.  And by “a few,” I mean 25 of each.  Unlike the more numerous Bowman Draft cards, these contained material from various different parts of the jerseys, including the small side panel sections, as seen in the Montero card above.  This set also featured the first Noah Syndergaard jersey cards as well as another non-qualifying Dilson Herrera card.

2014 Topps Pro Debut

Players: Dilson Herrera, Brandon Nimmo
Material: Primary, Secondary, Patch (Herrera only)

The first minor league product of the year, Pro Debut has a long history (all the way back to 2010) of including Futures Game material.  This year, it was where Topps burned off much of the material from lesser names, meaning Herrera (now shown as a member of the Savannah Sand Gnats and therefore eligible for inclusion here) and Nimmo.  While the material here is not identified as coming from the 2013 Futures Game, its origin is obvious.  The base jersey set (now called “Debut Duds” instead of “Minor League Materials”) featured two parallels (gold, numbered to 50, and silver, numbered to 25) with a mix of primary (front panels) and secondary (back panel) material.  No side panel swatches have been seen so far.  Dilson Herrera was also featured in the jumbo patch set (numbered to 5).

2014 Bowman Inception

Players: Rafael Montero, Noah Syndergaard, Dilson Herrera (patches only), Brandon Nimmo (patches only)
Material: Primary, Secondary, Patches

After a wait of nearly a year, Bowman Inception finally delivered Noah Syndergaard’s 2013 Futures Game material in quantity.  Syndergaard and Montero were both featured in the base memorabilia set with many parallels and variants containing material of various types, with many (but not all) of the low-numbered variants containing patches.  This is also the product that got most of the remaining large patches, including the apple ASG logo and letter patches (the 2013 Futures Game logo patches from Montero, Nimmo, and Syndergaard remain available for future products).

More to come as additional material is released, likely next up in 2014 Bowman Platinum.

Product Spotlight: 2014 Topps Archives

Send in the clones

Two years ago, Topps brought back the Archives brand for the fourth time (following 1982, 1993-1995, and 2001-2005), once again changing the formulation to fit the modern collecting landscape. 2013 brought a few key changes to Archives, some of which were kept in 2014′s iteration along with a lot of significant additions. In the end though, 2014 saw the smallest autograph checklist ever in Archives and the least variety in card designs, with parallels attempting to make up the difference.

Card Design

Like last year, 2014 Archives uses a more vintage card stock than the 2012 version. The years selected for this go-around are a bit odd. 1973 is a classic design that looks great with today’s printing technology. 1980 is also a solid design, but it was one of the featured designs in 2012 Archives. Too soon? And then there’s 1986… If there’s an ’80s Topps design to skip, that’s the one. 1989, also featured in the die-cut minis in 2014 Topps Series 1 and Series 2, is a reasonable choice considering its 25th anniversary, shared with the movie Major League. Unlike previous years though, the short prints did not feature any additional designs and were instead limited to these four. Even the Fan Favorite Autographs only added the base designs from 2013 Archives. I really don’t get what Topps was thinking with these choices.

Mets Selection

Six Mets made the cut in the 200-card Archives base set. Travis d’Arnaud and Wilmer Flores are the default Mets Rookies in everything this year, Tom Seaver and David Wright are franchise players, and Matt Harvey and Curtis Granderson are somewhere in the mix for additional filler. Sadly, there’s not much star power on this team, so this is about the best that could be expected. One disappointment is that only the 1973 and 1989 designs are featured, but the SPs take care of the rest.  In terms of photography, most of these look like spring training photos, which look great on these designs.  The Wilmer Flores photo adds another to the list of Mets shown in Los Mets jerseys in 2014 Topps products.  The Granderson though looks awful.  And awfully familiar…

Once, twice, three times a photoshop

Really, Topps? You didn’t get even a single picture of Granderson in spring training? By the end of May, there is no excuse to be using lame photoshop jobs for a player signed last year. Series 1 and Heritage get a pass, Gypsy Queen is pushing it, but Bowman and Archives are simply unacceptable.

SPs

One other change to this year’s Archives SPs is the appearance of active players among the 50 SPs. Zack Wheeler is the lone Met in the 1980 design and Mookie Wilson and John Olerud have 1986 covered. With no alternate designs, many retired players appear in designs from outside their playing years, which was previously only seen in base cards. Also like the base cards, the SPs use the same pseudo-vintage card stock as the base set. The only things setting the SPs apart now are the card numbers and insertion ratios.

Parallels

Like last year, all 200 base cards have a gold rainbow foil parallel numbered to 199. I still prefer the gold foil used in the 2012 Archives parallel, but I appear to be in the minority. New for 2014 and following in the silver trend seen in several other Topps products this year is a silver rainbow foil parallel numbered to 99. As in previous years, the SPs do not have parallels, which is a bit disappointing considering that most of the key RCs are SPs in 2014 Archives.

Mini Topps Deckle Inserts

In 2012 and 2013, the Archives Mets team set has been heavy on SPs and light on inserts. 2014 flips that around with only 3 SPs and a whopping 10 inserts. Unfortunately, three of those are of the mini deckle variety. The whole mini thing is so overdone at this point that, short of bringing back a Topps Leaders product, I would prefer to see all of these minis retired permanently. On top of that, the deckle edge die-cut pattern around black and white photographs with blue facsimile signatures creates one of the ugliest looks in all of sports cards. And yet it keeps coming back. I’m glad to see more John Olerud Mets cards, but I could do without this one.

1987 All-Star Inserts

This one is even more loaded, with Dwight Gooden, Gary Carter, Howard Johnson, and Matt Harvey featured here. These use the familiar design of the All-Star Commemorative Set cards inserted in rack packs from the ’80s. Unlike those cards though, these do not use glossy card stock and instead use the same standard card stock as most of the rest of the inserts. With so much of an emphasis on recreating vintage styles, the lack of high gloss here is a big miss and keeps this great design from really popping.

Other Inserts

But that’s not all. After getting Seaver in the 1972 basketball design last year, 2014 Archives brings us Seaver in the 1971 hockey design. Is football up next in 2015? Sadly, no Mets were featured in the most interesting insert set, the die-cut wood Firebrand insert set. 2014 Archives also featured two retail-exclusive insert sets, 1987 Future Stars and 1988 All-Stars (named “Retail Chase” for some reason). Howard Johnson and David Wright represent the Mets in those sets, respectively.

Fan Favorites Autographs

As always, the real draw among the common inserts is the Fan Favorites Autographs set. 2014 Archives features the smallest base autograph set of any Archives product with just 38 players signing this year. Five of those, John Olerud, Lenny Dykstra, Mookie Wilson, Howard Johnson, and Lenny Harris, are shown as Mets. Unlike the two previous Archives products, active players were also featured in this checklist, though none of them were Mets. Also unlike the previous Fan Favorites Autographs set, this year’s set features a few duplicate players from the 2012 and 2013 sets; Johnson and Wilson were also featured in 2013′s set and Olerud appeared in 2012′s set as a Blue Jay. Oddly, the lightened signature area that was introduced in 2013 was removed this time around, making the signatures harder to see (particularly on blue areas like Olerud’s jersey). The biggest change though would bring back something only previously seen in 2005.

Parallel Autographs

Parallels! The only time Archives autographs have had parallels before was back in 2005, and those were rainbow foil (similar to this year’s silver parallels) parallels numbered to 10. 2014 Archives went in a different direction with multiple tiers of colored border parallels: gold (retail exclusive, numbered to 50), silver (numbered to 25), purple (numbered to 10), sapphire (numbered to 5), and printing plates (four each numbered 1/1). Like we saw last year though, that doesn’t work for the 1990 design, so instead we got tinted background variants for those, which ranged from somewhat noticeable to nearly indistinguishable. The 1986 design fared somewhat better, but that’s really lipstick-on-a-pig territory:

And so it goes. The other designs looked decent, but purple? Silver I get because of this year’s silver fetish, but purple is an odd choice. First 2014 Bowman introduces purple base parallels numbered to 10 alongside the usual purple ice parallels numbered to 10 (not to be confused with the unnumbered retail exclusive purple prospect parallels), now this. It’s an odd time for Topps to start being consistent with its parallel numbering.

Other Mets

Several notable former Mets appeared in the 2014 Fan Favorites Autographs set with other teams. Carlos Baerga and Orlando Hernandez had their first certified autographs since the ’90s and Don Zimmer had his final autograph card to be issued before his death. Rickey Henderson also had a limited number of cards issued as redemptions.

The Rest

In addition to the Fan Favorites parallels, 2014 Archives featured several other low-numbered Mets autographs. David Wright and Mookie Wilson were in the 1981 mini autographs set, combining an awful design with the hated mini format. Gary Carter and Howard Johnson had 1987 All-Star autographs while Wright was featured again in a Retail Chase autograph variant. Darryl Strawberry, who was featured as a Yankee in the 1967 Winners Celebrate box toppers, was featured as a Met in the autograph variant. And that rounds out the Mets in this year’s Archives.

The Verdict

From a retail standpoint, the reduced production run (about half of last year’s Archives, or about 800 hobby cases plus retail) and the hot-selling Major League autographs made 2014 Archives a successful product. From a collector standpoint though, the value was limited unless you were lucky enough to hit a big card. That’s the norm these days, so it isn’t a surprise. Some of the base autographs held decent value, but the parallels, rather than adding value, devalued many of the base autographs. All five of the base Mets autographs were readily available for under $10 and even some of the printing plate autographs could be had for less than $20. No matter how you look at it, adding more of the same can’t take the place of variety.

The Mets team set has a different composition this year but still comes in at about the same size as always. Fewer SPs, more inserts, fewer autographs, more parallels, and no relics. The first Lenny Harris certified autographs and the first John Olerud Mets autographs since 1999 were definite highlights, but Topps missed the mark on several fronts. Between the odd design choices (and lack of design variety), the lack of gloss on the 1987 All-Star inserts, the underwhelming overload of parallel autographs, the return of mini deckles, and the awful relic design (with no Mets at least), there’s a lot of room for improvement. And that’s not even getting into the absurdly tiny (4 cards!) Major League insert set and the last-minute cancellation of The Warriors cards. Two years after bringing back a classic, Topps is spinning its wheels more than realizing the potential of the Archives brand.